Check out this amazing story which not only proves quantum entanglement is real, but it can be seen with the human eye!
“Entanglement is one of the strangest consequences of quantum mechanics. After interacting in a certain way, objects become mysteriously linked, or entangled, so that what happens to one seems to affect the fate of the other. For the most part, researchers have only found signs of entanglement between tiny particles, such as ions, atoms and photons.
John Martinis and colleagues at the University of California, Santa Barbara looked for entanglement between two superconductors, each less than a millimeter across. These superconducting circuits, made of aluminum, were separated by a few millimeters on an electronic chip. At low temperatures, electrons in the superconductors flow collectively, unfettered by resistance.
Despite each superconductor’s relatively large size, the electrons within move together in a naturally coherent way. “There are very few moving parts, so to speak,” Girvin says, which helped the scientists spot evidence of entanglement. “It’s a general fact that the larger an object is, the more classical it is in its behavior, and the more difficult it is to see quantum mechanical effects.”
In the new study, researchers used a microwave pulse to attempt to entangle the electrical currents of the two superconductors. If the currents were quantum-mechanically linked, one current would flow clockwise at the time of measurement (assigned a value of 0), while the other would flow counterclockwise when measured (assigned a value of 1), Martinis says. On the other hand, the currents’ directions would be completely independent of each other if everyday, classical physics were at work.
After attempting to entangle the superconducting circuits, Martinis and his team measured the directions of the currents 34.1 million times. When one current flowed clockwise (measured as a 0), the team found, the other flowed counterclockwise (measured as a 1) with very high probability. So the two were linked in a way that only quantum mechanics could explain.
“It has to be in this weird quantum state for you to get those particular probabilities that we measure,” Martinis says. “The percentages of those different things are not something that you can classically predict.””
Click Here to Read the Complete Article…
Write On!
Related Posts - Entropy Versus Evolution – A Philosophical Conundrum – Part 2 Does Evolution Drive Entropy or Vice Versa? If our universe, and everything in our physical experience, is continuously moving toward a more disorganised state, and we as physical beings are continuously adapting to a higher state of chaos, then how can we evolve into a more perfect organism? The cold......
- Entropy Versus Evolution – A Philosophical Conundrum – Part 1 Entropy Versus Evolution – A Philosophical Conundrum – Part 1 As I grapple with understanding the effects of the laws, dictated by quantum physics on our physical experience of the world, these two suppositions seem to clash with one another. Before we can conduct an in-depth discussion though, we need......
- Things I Think I Think (and Personal Finance Links) Let's dig right in this week... Is this Getting Old? - I think I'm curious if people are enjoying this format or if it's growing tiresome. I'm trying to mix in some personal thoughts so that you have an idea of who I am and where I'm coming from when......
- Selling By Yourself By Using Your Article Advertising When it comes to promoting yourself, there is no greater solution to pull it off than writing posts. By submitting well-written, useful articles or blog posts to on the web publishers, you can grow to be an authority figure in the industry and be regarded as the one to go......










Hi Curtis: It’s been a pet theory of mine that the Universe will indeed expand to a point and then begin to collapse upon itself, (due to gravity?) re-form into a “tight” package of energy and Big Bang all over again. As a matter of fact, I have that a few others have same theory, thought I can’t quote those readings right now. I am well. Hope you are same. (will comment on blog.) Write On ! Bob (Sorry this isn’t current with the post this comment is about. I apologize. Still getting the hang of this stuff.)
Hi Dr Bob,
Comments are always appreciated! The concept you propose has some interesting twists when you consider the flow of time in the equation…more to come soon!
Write On!
C
I esteem the precious knowledge you recommend in your post. I will bookmark your blog and have my kid check up here regularly. I am rather sure they will learn a huge of new stuff here than anybody else!
Hi George,
Thanks and I hope we both can learn something from my humble blog…